3 ms·
What about cooling? As engines get smaller they quite often will dump in extra fuel under load to ensure the cylinder doesn't melt. E85 does that even better,
by WirelessGigabit 3y ago
What about cooling? As engines get smaller they quite often will dump in extra fuel under load to ensure the cylinder doesn't melt.
E85 does that even better, as the cost of being less dense. But it cools so much better you can run higher boost.
What about LPG?
And if we want LPG to be something we still have to deal with legislation, like in many countries you can't park in an underground garage with LPG.
- ed_balls 3y ago> will dump in extra fuel under load to ensure the cylinder doesn't melt They dump extra fuel to prevent knock. It's hard to melt cylinders. > can't park in an underground garage with LPG And yet people park. I haven't heard about an accident in the last 5 years. Maybe it could be managed by an extra detector? LPG engines could be excellent generators (back ups or range extenders for cars and trucks). The emit less particulate matter and NOx.
- fodkodrasz 3y agoI'm not a mechanical engineer, but for one I have driven my father's LPG-converted car, and the cylinder didn't melt so far, so I think this is already more-or-less under control. Many car vendors in the EU (especially south and east) offered LPG-petrol bi-fuel powered cars out of the box. (I know of Dacia and Fiat for sure, and according to my brother LPG converted hybrid Priuses are popular in Poland for insanely cheap operations by cab drivers for example). For engines getting smaller: the LPG operation of petrol engines provides lower power output (and lower torque), so an uptick in LPG powered (dual fuel?) cars would probably mandate slightly different engines sensible (bigger ones), the market would surely adapt to it. E85 would also be fine if it wouldn't be manufactured from intensively farmed monocultural agricultural products, which make it totally non-sustainable and non-renewable factoring in the sustainability problems of industrial agriculture (soil erosion, carbon depletion of soil, death of soil microbiome, groundwater depletion, etc) The parking ban for LPG in closed garages is a real problem, I have faced it myself. Though it is justifiable, but then it would also be justified for the BEVs as there were cases already where (heat from) a battery fire compromised the structural integrity parking complexes, so it is a manageable risk probably, and probably mostly legislative.
- SoftTalker 3y ago> in many countries you can't park in an underground garage with LPG I'm not sure why parking with LPG is a problem but parking with 10-20 gallons of gasoline is not?
- jaclaz 3y agoLPG is a gas, and it is heavier than air. In case of a leak there is a risk in case of a not-ventilated enough underground garage it is possible that the gas accumulates in the lower parts before it can be sensed/sniffed, and a mix of just 2.1% with air is already at risk of explosion if a spark is generated. Security norms changed in the EU around 2001, the norm is the ECE/ONU 67-01 (though different countries may have implemented differently in the local Law) and LPG powered cars conforming to that standard are allowed (generally) to be parked in underground garages BUT only on the first underground floor and only if the garage is conforming to some (earlier) ventilation standards. AFAIK cases of explosions/fires related to LPG car tanks are extremely rare (thanks also to the added safety measures mandated by ECE/ONU 67-01), whilst fires/explosions originated by domestic LPG use, while not common, are more common than what they should be (the tanks in themselves are generally safe, but the - often underground - pipings often are not).
- SoftTalker 3y agoGasoline vapors are also heavier than air, and its lower explosive limit is only 1.4%. If my parked car leaks 10 gallons of gasoline is that really any different? Or are LPG tanks more prone to leaking? I would think not, because they are probably heavier steel not the 18 gauge sheet metal (or plastic) of an automobile gas tank. But if the rule is there, I guess it must be. Hard for me to see the rationale though.