3 ms·
No, I think the confusion here is the difference between "acceleration" and "expansion rate". It's less ambigious when using math: https://en.wikipedia.org/wik
by mr_mitm 3y ago
No, I think the confusion here is the difference between "acceleration" and "expansion rate".
It's less ambigious when using math: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model#Cosmic_expansion_history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model#Cosmic_expans...
a is the scale factor, which goes as sinh^(2/3). a' and a'' will always increase, but the _expansion rate_ a'/a will approach a constant value from above.
Besides the Hubble tension discussed in the article, there is no real discrepancy between observations and theory.
- bmitc 3y ago> a is the scale factor, which goes as sinh^(2/3). a' and a'' will always increase, but the _expansion rate_ a'/a will approach a constant value from above. Thanks for that. I didn't realize there was such a definition of expansion rate and was going off the intuitive meaning of the terms. Thank you for the clarifications.