I guess they're saying they, as a consumer, are disappointed? This is a confusing article, when they speak to UAV, Self driving vehicles etc, are they talking a

I guess they're saying they, as a consumer, are disappointed? This is a confusing article, when they speak to UAV, Self driving vehicles etc, are they talking about industry consumers like Hyundai? (SK owns Uber in Korea). I don't think the average person on the street here in Korea cares that much about autonomous systems. As a consumer of SK 5G, I'm certainly not disappointed. I recently visited other countries and I missed Korean internet so much, SK 5G is great! Edit: reading the white-paper, I suppose they're talking about the average person on the street... Seems, odd. "Even at the time when preparing for 5G, services such as autonomous driving, UAM, XR, hologram, and digital twin had appeared and expected, but most of them did not live up to expectations. We should have taken a more objective perspective. For example, whether 5G technology alone could change the future, or whether the overall environment constituting the service was prepared together. If so, the gap between the public's expectations for 5G and the reality would not have been large. 3D video, UHD streaming, AR/VR, autonomous driving, remote surgery, etc. are representative services that are not still successful presented by the 5G Vision Recommendation. Most of them are the result of a combination of factors such as device SK Telecom 6G White Paper form factor constraints, immaturity of device and service technology, low or absent market demand, and policy/regulation issues, rather than a single factor of the lack of 5G performance. Therefore, to successfully settle innovative services in the 6G era, all participants in the ecosystem should work together to prepare the environment along with 6G technology."