3 ms·
I maintain one as well, and had it approved despite the source having a bug, so that doesn’t sound like much of a source.
by Semaphor 3y ago
I maintain one as well, and had it approved despite the source having a bug, so that doesn’t sound like much of a source.
- mmis1000 3y agoI don't think they ever care about whether your extension has bug or not. They probably only review whether your extension has weird minified code or dependencies.
- Semaphor 3y agoIt was a bug that prevented building it. If they just look at the source code without building it, they’ll have no idea if it’s the same code at all, and it would be useless.
- mmis1000 3y agoThat's weird. Probably it depends on reviewer? Or probably the reviewer figured out how to compile your source some way? In my experience, the reproducible requirement is always forced.
- Semaphor 3y agoSee my other comment [0], manual reviews have been optional for a long time. There was quite the outcry when they stopped reviewing everything. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37218820 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37218820