3 ms·
* human capital would improve as the most skilled wouldn't become feeble and die, and would instead see their skills continue to improve * quality of life woul
by ETH_start 3y ago
* human capital would improve as the most skilled wouldn't become feeble and die, and would instead see their skills continue to improve
* quality of life would massively improve as far fewer people would suffer the tragedy of permanently losing loved ones, and would be saved from the ravages of aging and the anguish of an impending death. Saying nothing about the vastly deeper and greater experiences that much longer lifespans would impart.
By world, you mean the environment, due to population growth? By that logic, we should reduce healthcare spending to reduce life expectancy, and with it, the human population.
I am pro-humanity, so I want to end death for all people. The problems of overpopulation can be addressed through other means.