4 ms·
You may have a point but you should argue against the data in the article rather than one anecdote.
by quickthrower2 3y ago
You may have a point but you should argue against the data in the article rather than one anecdote.
- Finnucane 3y agoAlso, not sure Twitter's price is a great example of a reliable value.
- derbOac 3y agoYou were being downvoted but I had the same thought — not as a statement about Twitter but because the circumstances of the sale were so controversial.
- s1artibartfast 3y agoThe best Counterpoint is that the average time of a company being part of the Fortune 500 is declining over time. This means that there's greater turnover and disruption. a Fortune 500 company today is less likely to still be a Fortune 500 company tomorrow then most of the history of the Fortune 500. This tells a different story than the article which focuses on the average age of companies including time not part of the Fortune 500. It would be interesting to run the same analysis for the Fortune 100 and the fortune 500 to 400 companies https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/only-52-us-companies-have-been-on-the-fortune-500-since-1955-thanks-to-the-creative-destruction-that-fuels-economic-prosperity-2/ https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/only-52-us-companies-have-bee...