> So your point he is indeed always right? No, their point is that this does not refute said hypothetical claim. That is, their point is that it is not, as you

> So your point he is indeed always right? No, their point is that this does not refute said hypothetical claim. That is, their point is that it is not, as you claimed: > Another proof that Linus is not always right. (I don't know if their point is correct, but it's of the form "your argument against X is invalid", not "X is correct".)