3 ms·
IMO, this could be discussed so much more rigorously... I think we have the framework for it. All work exploits some gradient of energy, i.e. a potential diffe
by dmn322 3y ago
IMO, this could be discussed so much more rigorously... I think we have the framework for it.
All work exploits some gradient of energy, i.e. a potential difference. Any "innovation" is a discovery of some such gradient. As the gradient is exploited, the difference in potential decreases. The innovation loses its potential return on investment. The most basic reason for this is that the simplest/least costly methods for exploiting the difference will be the most likely to be discovered.
Our societies organize around these processes for exploiting gradients. Greater influence is given to those who can do the most work. That influence directs future collective investments. Those with the influence will use it to increase investment in the source of their profit... extraction of work from the same gradient which they've been exploiting.
Eventually that gradient is exploited beyond an positive return on investment. All low-hanging fruit has been consumed. There is no longer investment available for finding other gradients along which work can be done and those with influence use that influence to extract resources from other members of the society since their external gradient no longer exists. Their influence increases in proportion to the other members' and the society eventually eats itself.
IMO there's the basis for a quantitative model in there. The conclusions are total speculation, but the basic foundations I think are valid. (They mostly come from a combo of information theory, joseph tainter's collapse of complex society, as well as "incomplete nature" by terrence deacon). But of course we don't have the money available for investigation into such things :/ Funding seems to only be available for models that bolster existing sources of profit.
https://spacechimplife.com/theories-of-historical-change/ https://spacechimplife.com/theories-of-historical-change/
- Gibbon1 3y agoOne of my points is invocation requires excess resources. If you poke around you see all sorts of under-capitalized industries.
- Animats 3y ago> IMO, this could be discussed so much more rigorously... I think we have the framework for it. Indeed. Very important subject, weak article. The best example is Japan. Japan was growing and innovating rapidly until 1989. Then there was a crash. The Nikkei index went down, and down, and down, until bottoming out in 2014 at about a quarter of the peak. Then recovery began, although the level of 1989 has never been exceeded.[1] In the 1970s and 1980s, Japan powered the world's consumer electronics industry. From ICs to VCRs to cars, it all came from Japan, with good quality at low prices. Then that ended. Not because the business sector was in decline. China wasn't a major competitor in the 1990s. But the growth in Japan had stopped. This used be called the "lost decade" in Japan. Then the "lost decades".[2] So Japan is where to look at this problem. Innovation in Japan declined despite massive government attempts to push it. Japan has "Tsukuba Science City", which has many government-funded labs but is not the home of major industries. So that didn't really work. What happened? [1] https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/TVC-NI225/ https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/TVC-NI225/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Decades https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Decades