Your sentence on its own would be alarming if it were generalized. But this is specific and particular. A person dispensing alcohol in many states and province

Your sentence on its own would be alarming if it were generalized. But this is specific and particular. A person dispensing alcohol in many states and provinces is legally responsible for safety of their patrons. Argument might be made that in all cases they have some moral responsibility as well - although I understand there are people who will philosophically disagree with this and I think interesting discussion can be had there. A person with "felony DUI" has proven to a tremendous (and usually repeated) degree that they cannot execute a key portion of what their liquor license actually entails. So understanding slippery slope arguments and so on, in this one case, I'm not outraged at the regulation.