3 ms·
Not costing lives. But saving lifetimes across a population.
by dijit 3y ago
Not costing lives. But saving lifetimes across a population.
- icepat 3y agoI can easily imagine a situation where life support hardware needs to reboot, and taking too long to do so would be life threatening.
- JohnFen 3y ago"So if you make it boot ten seconds faster, you've saved a dozen lives." That's emotional blackmail. The implication is failing to do that will cost a dozen lives. It's also incorrect. Making it boot ten seconds faster saves zero lives.
- xcdzvyn 3y agoI'll go out on a limb and suggest the clever people at Apple were aware making ill-performing operating system software isn't going to literally kill people.
- JohnFen 3y agoOf course. I'm not asserting otherwise. I'm also not disagreeing with the underlying point. What I'm disagreeing with is engaging in highly manipulative emotional language -- which isn't even technically correct -- to make it.
- dijit 3y agoI don't know how to understand it for you. You could make claims like that about anything. You could equally claim "Have a nice day" is a threatening remark. You have to be spectactularly stupid to think that not making software faster is going to cost people their life. But it could, across a population, cost entire lifetimes worth of time. So yes, it's important to consider your software's cost to humanity. The issue here is that you're rejecting a clear explanation of your externalities. Stop rationalising the externalisation of your costs; they still exist even if you don't enjoy being confronted with it.
- JohnFen 3y ago> The issue here is that you're rejecting a clear explanation of your externalities. No, the issue here is Jobs making a legitimate point in the most emotionally manipulative way he could think of.
- dijit 3y agoHonestly I couldn't possibly disagree more. Pointing out that you're stepping on toes is not emotional blackmail. Emotional blackmail is either direct: “If you hang out with your buddies tonight, I will pack my bags and leave you.” or indirect: “I don't even spend time with my friends because I want to spend more time with you." What Jobs is doing is pointing out a fact. That it hurts you this much informs me more of your developmental attitude than it does about Jobs being an asshole. Which he was, but not for this.