3 ms·
I'll bet against it tho. I don't actually believe pure text-prompt-to-image will improve much (not in a few months at least). I just believe there will be more
by raincole 3y ago
I'll bet against it tho. I don't actually believe pure text-prompt-to-image will improve much (not in a few months at least). I just believe there will be more non-text tools to guide AI, like LoRA and control net, and they will be more accessible.
Control net kinda did what you said but in a different timeframe: it was quite difficult to tell AI to generate a person "sitting with their legs cross". Today, it's relatively easy to do this with control net, but still hard with text prompt only.
Edit: and the sibling comment made me question myself why I would ever take a random bet on the internet.
- jefftk 3y agoWe started this thread with: sambleckley> producing a specific image with generative AI is sometimes almost impossible justrealist> Who could possibly think this will be the case six months from now? me> I'd bet on this being true six months from now I thought you disagreed with me on this, but it sounds like maybe not?
- raincole 3y agoI was just stating the improvement on SD we've seen since DELL-E 2 and Midjourney came out wasn't just about "quality of image", but also about "have something specific and moderately complex in mind". Thus I mentioned textual inversion vs LoRA/ControlNet.