I disagree that what was done with good but agree with matklad [0] about basic expectations of transparency and communication when you maintain de facto standar

I disagree that what was done with good but agree with matklad [0] about basic expectations of transparency and communication when you maintain de facto standards. This is too big of an "experiment" to run in production code on the ecosystem without first seeking input of drawing attention to it. If any of this was done to "push the conversation forward", it is done in an unhealthy way that burns a lot of bridges. As for making progress on the idea of improving build times, I agree with kayabaNerve from the Pre-RFC [1] > It's effectively impossible to fairly review this on its merit now, nor to say it isn't being reviewed on an accelerated time span than it would otherwise have been. [0] https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/15va70a/serde_has_started_shipping_precompiled_binaries/jwuacsp/ https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/15va70a/serde_has_sta... [1] https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-sandboxed-deterministic-reproducible-efficient-wasm-compilation-of-proc-macros/19359/5?u=epage https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-sandboxed-determin...