2 ms·
No, I think it is mainly because it's optimized for 1024 x 1024 images, rather than 512 x 512 as the previous version was.
by not2b 3y ago
No, I think it is mainly because it's optimized for 1024 x 1024 images, rather than 512 x 512 as the previous version was.
- Our_Benefactors 3y agoIt’s both. More pixel space and more parameters.