4 ms·
It doesn't maintain anything. It redistributes money from the wealthy to the poor, but a large amount of that money gets lost on other things. Then, when it doe
by personomas 3y ago
It doesn't maintain anything. It redistributes money from the wealthy to the poor, but a large amount of that money gets lost on other things. Then, when it does reach the poor, it doesn't actually help them motivate their life - they become dependent on government funding.
Taxes put tremendous stress on the working class. Socialism oppresses the working class.
The best way anyways to maintain a minimum social level is with persistent and healthy growth.
- hamdouni 3y agoI did not observe the effects you are describing, on the contrary. Where can I read more about those affirmations ?
- personomas 3y ago> The best way anyways to maintain a minimum social level is with persistent and healthy growth. This one is just logical. As society continues to grow and expand, then there's more available to lift the poor out of poverty. The other points I made arise primarily out of my experiences living in Germany and US in connection with my understandings. There might information somewhere, but I can't point to them now, sorry. But I do highly recommend the following book for other very interesting social/political ideas: Urantia. (The social/political ideas start later in the book, not right at the start.) Thank you.