5 ms·

Ask HN: What do you do to reduce stress or keep work stress away from work life?

10 points by new_learner 3y ago

Recently got diagnosed with generalized anxiety just 2 years after getting promoted as a Eng. Manager. It seems that I am stuck in a vicious circle where my work woes keep me from being my best in the personal life (exercise, spending quality time with family, sleep) and resulting issues in physical and mental ealth means I slip up more at work and the cycle repeats. Wondering what are some goto behaviors/tactics I might be lacking to make it work.

Nickersf 3y ago
First, thing I would consider is mentality. I'm a developer and there are times where I just shut it down after the shift and force myself to forget about work. Shut it off and just start doing other activities. Second, slow down on work related projects and activities. Sometimes I just stop thinking about or working on programming related side projects for a week or so to cleanse the palette.
ac2u 3y ago
It'll help to internalise a few general truths. - If your work woes are caused by an anxiety to perform and think you're doing well at work, chances are in most cases other people will think so too. In general, people will think less about you than you're paranoid about. - If you're anxious that "bad thing X will happen unless I do A, B and C", then write down your worries of what the consequences (Y) will be if you don't do A, B and C. Then, selectively avoid completing certain tasks, or let them run late. I'm not talking about core work tasks here, use your own judgement. Why do this? Well, you want to be able to revisit this list later and see if the consequences were as you predicted. Chances are for a lot of things no one will care. Then you're building up a base of evidence that your more neurotic tendencies aren't the best predictor of the future, and you can adjust accordingly. Sometimes this base of hard evidence is needed for certain personalities to really internalise the lessons.
night-rider 3y ago
Don't bring your work home. Even better, see your work as a form of play to make it easier. It's worth re-framing work as play since nobody wants to see their work as drudgery.
helph67 3y ago
I take and recommend magnesium each night just prior to bed. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/magnesium-the-most-powerf_b_425499 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/magnesium-the-most-powerf_b_4... You should discuss it with your G.P. If you own a dog, regularly take it for a walk in `green areas' (parks/gardens (away from traffic)). If you don't own a dog, get one.
- meristohm 3y ago
  Since my dog died I walk more and get better exercise. It's okay to walk alone (easy for this White male to say...). Please don't take lightly the adoption of a companion animal (or other type of working animal); we choose how they live and often how they die, and they are each an individual worthy of love and care (hence, as helph67 might be pointing at, their help in getting us outside to meet their needs, IF we actually care; I've seen too many people who have a dog as an ornament or solely to guard their property as the dog gains weight and gets cranky).
atomicnature 3y ago
My personal philosophy is: "Increase capabilities". I consider Stress as an indicator of skill/resource deficits (not always). I find "sticking to the process" to be most important characteristic in increasing capabilities. The gym analogy is appropriate here. If I stop working out because I can't manage a particular weight, then I become weaker overtime (or stagnate at best). But if I persist despite the initial pressures, even if imperfectly, then eventually I become capable of handling the extra weight. Man needs an arena to struggle, to overcome; without that a human being cannot fully develop oneself.
- gardenhedge 3y ago
  That's a dangerous philosophy
  - atomicnature 3y ago
    Why so? Who become the best engineers? Those who struggle the most with engineering issues. Who become the best musicians? Those who struggle the most to refine their skills with their instruments, etc. Who become the best scientists? Those who struggle the most with the theories/problems at hand. What's the danger? I'd argue living with lower capabilities is more dangerous than otherwise; it's even less fulfilling to live with limited skills/resources.
    - gardenhedge 3y ago
      Because 1) it's incorrect which you admit. 2) It can lead to mistreating Stress I disagree with all those points. The ones who struggle the most likely fail.
      - atomicnature 3y ago
        You're just making an assertion that my claim is incorrect. Practical experience shows - consistent effort does indeed deliver results, and leads to improvement in capability (by and large - as pointed in my original answer). For example, the whole education effort of 14-15 years is full of painful experiences, getting wrong answers in math, flunking in laboratories, etc. There is stress involved during the examination. If I simply avoid the exams citing stress, how'd I ever become capable? Therefore, I don't see how you could be correct on this.
poorbutdebtfree 3y ago
Travel to the third world and ask the locals on how they deal with eating only once a day.
DataJunkie 3y ago
If I have a lot of time, I will mountain bike. If I have a short amount of time, I will do some gardening. It's very relaxing and rewarding in a simple kind of way.

wruza 3y ago

In my case it lead to secretly accumulating anxiety until it blew up in my face after 35. I believe OP is similar. Sticking to the process of struggle has its own benefits, but it also may make you wake up one day and realize it was 10 years of struggling nowhere while everyone around enjoyed life and achieved at least the same. Worst case is when you’re 50+ at that realization. Maybe gym is not a good target for my criticism, as it changes the chemistry in a positive way. But I doubt that psychological struggle does any good, unless you’re regularly seeing a therapist or have a great self-reflection ability.

atomicnature 3y ago
Why don't we see "psychological struggle" (or stress) as an indicator of skill/resource deficit? Whenever there is struggle, we notice our own deficiencies. The point is not to continue with the same struggle forever, but to graduate into more sophisticated struggles - just like we graduate into higher grades in school. That was my overall message. That we have to continually solve the problems. And there's never an end to the process.. Another perspective: The 1st grader is stressed by 1st grade problems, but the 10th grader is not stressed by 1st grade problems. This clearly demonstrates stress is related to capability. And also provides hope that through effort and time, one can graduate to higher levels.
- wruza 3y ago
  Speaking for myself, I just didn’t know how minds work. Iow, I didn’t see it and there was no good source suggested by anyone to learn from. Ironically, the solution to job-related anxiety turned out to be somewhat incompatible with “having a job” (in a sense I always had of it, not in general). You’re right from the general point of view, from overlook. The thing I’d add is that self-development may and often is completely out of your scope, according to my observations at least. It’s akin to a businessman asking poor what the hell they’re struggling with when the world is full of opportunities. Well, they look and can’t see it. They struggle in a wrong direction (added:) and it consumes all their attention.
  - atomicnature 3y ago
    Re: self-development One of my observations in HN, and in most places I have been to is a strong preference for "comfort-orientation". People simply dislike when I propose that - taking on a challenge, working on a problem in a persistent/consistent way is needed, and that there is a price to pay. I feel the problem is truly at the philosophical level of their minds (not at a practical level). Therefore, instead of "self-development", I'm performing the "assumption-destroying" job here. It is an unpleasant affair overall, but I'm simply interested in the psychology & dynamics of the phenomenon. The people who get into trouble usually buy the assumption that there is a formulaic solution, where they don't have to pay some serious price to get a real solution. They want something that takes less time, takes very little effort, and still delivers great benefits. I tend to emphasize "challenge-orientation" to counter this inherent bias I've seen in people. Ultimately, I challenge people at this level in the hopes that my strong emphasis on "challenge-orientation" does them some good in the long run :) PS: You can see my comment history and notice, whenever I bring up the "challenge-orientation" idea, there is, almost without exception, at least one person seriously upset that a significant price may have to be paid to solve significant problems.