3 ms·
No it isn't. My original point is that Latin-1 is used very rarely on Internet and is being phased out. Now it's your turn to provide some references that a sig
by ko27 3y ago
No it isn't. My original point is that Latin-1 is used very rarely on Internet and is being phased out. Now it's your turn to provide some references that a significant percentage of websites are omitting encoding (which is required by spec!) and using Latin-1.
But if you insist, here is this quote:
https://www.w3docs.com/learn-html/html-character-sets.html https://www.w3docs.com/learn-html/html-character-sets.html
> UTF-8 is the default character encoding for HTML5. However, it was used to be different. ASCII was the character set before it. And the ISO-8859-1 was the default character set from HTML 2.0 till HTML 4.01.
or another:
https://www.dofactory.com/html/charset https://www.dofactory.com/html/charset
> If a web page starts with <!DOCTYPE html> (which indicates HTML5), then the above meta tag is optional, because the default for HTML5 is UTF-8.
- bawolff 3y ago> My original point is that Latin-1 is used very rarely on Internet and is being phased out. Nobody disagrees with this, but this is a very different statement from what you said originally in regards to what the default is. Things can be phased out but still have the old default with no plan to change the default. Re other sources - how about citing the actual spec instead of sketchy websites that seem likely to have incorrect information.