3 ms·
Doesn't it bother you even a little bit that all of the so called "investigators" are in the same boat? I don't have proof, that doesn't mean I'm not allowed t
by codr7 3y ago
Doesn't it bother you even a little bit that all of the so called "investigators" are in the same boat?
I don't have proof, that doesn't mean I'm not allowed to speak.
As a general rule of thumb; whenever you get terribly upset that someone else has a different opinion, it's time to take a step back and look at the bigger picture.
- sjsdaiuasgdia 3y ago>Doesn't it bother you even a little bit that all of the so called "investigators" are in the same boat? I don't follow this sentence at all. Can you be a bit clearer about what you mean here?
- codr7 3y agoNone of these so called "investigators" were even close to objective.
- sjsdaiuasgdia 3y agoI don't see a conspiracy spanning every level of government and the media, I guess? It seems like something close to that would be required for so many people from so many different political backgrounds to look and find nothing. Or maybe you're defining "not objective" as "doesn't produce the result I wanted"...
- codr7 3y agoIt's a theory, an alternative explanation, we are allowed to have those without evidence and it's OK to have multiple competing explanations. A better question would be: Why are you so desperate to believe one thing or the other?
- sjsdaiuasgdia 3y agoAt some point that just devolves into one person pointing at a dog and saying "that's a dog" and the other saying "nu'uh it's a cat". Cat guy isn't doing anything illegal but they're still making a claim without evidence and refusing to let go of the claim in the face of contrary evidence. I'm genuinely worried about my country's ability to recover from what the Big Lie is doing to it, so I do care about the topic, and I do try to argue for sanity and truth where I can.