So your point he is indeed always right? Or was right in that particular case (he was not)? If you remember, Linux complained not about the particular implemen

So your point he is indeed always right? Or was right in that particular case (he was not)? If you remember, Linux complained not about the particular implementation of AVX-512, but the concept itself. It is also kinda looks ignorant of him (and anyone else who thinks the same way) to believe that AVX-512 is only about 512 or it has no potential, being a just simply better SIMD ISA compared to AVX1/2. What he did he just expressed himself in his trademark silly edgy maximalist way. It is an absolute pleasure to work with, gives great performance boost, and he should have more careful with his statements.