6 ms·
I'm confused. Of course Intel chips were better for laptops, that's exactly what I said.
by manuelabeledo 3y ago
I'm confused. Of course Intel chips were better for laptops, that's exactly what I said.
- iainmerrick 3y agoThat’s why I said “including power usage and price” above. IBM just weren’t able and/or willing to match Intel’s chips for Apple’s purposes. (As I recall, but maybe I misremember, Apple claimed a big performance advantage for their high-end G5 Macs but in the real world it was a bit dubious.)