3 ms·
True from a purely technical point-of-view, but doesn't take into account how companies make decisions about adopting platform tech and that they're making thes
by intellectronica 3y ago
True from a purely technical point-of-view, but doesn't take into account how companies make decisions about adopting platform tech and that they're making these choices for good reasons.
When companies choose SF or DB they don't make a decision to install one of these platforms because there is no combination of open-source components and bespoke engineering work that could replace them and even be more flexible and efficient. They are choosing these platforms because they make it easy to manage data operations holistically, because it's easier to hire people who already know them well, because they are opinionated and restrict the range of bad or just strange decisions someone in the organisation could be making if they were not restricted, and of course for enterprise support, available from a single reputable vendor.
See also: 80% of companies don't need Kubernetes, 80% of companies don't need a big-3 cloud, 80% of companies don't need managed security solutions, 80% of companies don't need SAP, 80% of companies don't need Salesforce, etc etc etc...
- ptero 3y agoMany companies also install DB, k8, etc. because costs don't matter as much. In the times of easy money they focus on running fast, borrowing if needed. When money is harder to borrow, as it is now, some of those decisions get reassessed. My 2c.
- catchnear4321 3y agocost of migration is part of any assessment worth anything. rarely cheap, rarely on time. not that some companies won’t bleed themselves out in a panicked effort to try and stop a paper cut.