4 ms·
See what a useful exercise it is to look at the actual sentences I wrote? Gone are the claims that I consider the extra things you can do in a talk "mere bagga
by pg 15y ago
See what a useful exercise it is to look at the actual
sentences I wrote? Gone are the claims that I consider the
extra things you can do in a talk "mere baggage"
(I said the opposite in the last paragraph) and that
"essays are baggage-free" (I said the opposite in the 8th
paragraph). Now all I'm being accused of is claiming that
having good ideas is most of writing well, and that
it is a smaller component of speaking well than writing well.
Frankly these seem such commonplace claims that I think
more people would accuse me of wasting the reader's time
with platitudes than saying things that are false.
For the sake of completeness I'll defend them anyway:
1. You can't explain something clearly if you don't
understand it yourself. Your writing may be fine at the phonetic level, but you won't for example be able to use any metaphors. Your audience will feel like they're being driven in a Ferrari over ploughed fields.
2. Who is generally considered to be better able to
cause people to believe mistaken ideas, speakers or
writers? When you imagine a demagogue, for example,
do you imagine someone speaking before an audience or
sitting at a desk writing?
- hammerdr 15y agoFor those that did not catch it: #1 used a metaphor to prove the point that using metaphors is not superfluous. golf clap :) The question is: did the metaphor take away from the point? Absolutely not. In fact, it helped to solidify it. === You're both right and talking passed each other. Writing and speaking both have their flourishes. Writing has constructs and techniques that are not strictly necessary just as oration does. There are also factors besides the content that affect the results of both mediums: writing something in my notebook does not have the same effect as posting it to my blog. So, as far as the tools available, writing and speaking are on the same level for recording and sharing ideas. However, people are more susceptible to spoken word. There is a reason that poetry is read aloud. This can be used for good or evil but it does encourage people to spend more time preparing for the "flourishes" of speaking than the content. I don't think anyone in this thread fundamentally disagrees with those statements :)
- mbateman 15y agoAre those really commonplaces? Because they are both false. Having good ideas is equally important for speaking and writing well. And you can be snowed in multiple media. Your #1, at least, applies to both speaking and writing. In fact I'd think it applies more to speaking. Think of teachers and lecturers who can explain things with analogies on the fly, vs. those who just repeat things at the same level.