2 ms·
If he meant "we'll fire half and rehire them as contractors, but the other half must work at the office" then they are on track. They did fire 20k of 80k, 20k m
by throwaway290 3y ago
If he meant "we'll fire half and rehire them as contractors, but the other half must work at the office" then they are on track. They did fire 20k of 80k, 20k more and the promise is fulfilled even if there is no remote among FTEs.
- 5350-uiop-1130 3y agoyes. all driven by shareholders demands imo. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/nov/15/major-investor-calls-on-google-owner-to-aggressively-cut-staff-and-pay https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/nov/15/major-inv...
- angoragoats 3y agoAre you aware that this link is about Alphabet, that we are talking about Meta here, and that Alphabet is not Meta? Zuckerberg owns a special class of stock in his company that gives him total control, despite the existence of other institutional shareholders. The buck stops with him and therefore blame for any bad business decisions can be squarely placed on his shoulders.
- throwaway290 3y agoI think the point may have been that shareholders can put pressure and sell off stock and shareholder motivations are probably similar among big tech companies