6 ms·
As a 10 year "veteran" of BofA who resigned when the shit started hitting the fan in 2008, there are a few things I feel I should clarify. Bank of America used
by kimwim42 15y ago
As a 10 year "veteran" of BofA who resigned when the shit started hitting the fan in 2008, there are a few things I feel I should clarify.
Bank of America used to be a reputable organization, and Taibbi did touch on this. I joined the company right as it was completing its "merger" (i.e. hostile takeover) with Nations Bank--a crummy, aggressive Southern bank with a penchant for fascist business models led by criminals Hugh McColl and his lackey Ken Lewis.
In the months that followed Nations Bank's acquisition of BofA, which, prior to the "merger," only had domestic coverage on the West Coast and some of the Southwest, most of the key San Francisco leadership were either forced to resign or resigned in protest against the inevitable wave of dirty business dealings coming in from the South--this, of course, was Nations Bank's plan.
So, the company changed drastically over a period of several years during the last decade--and so did the business ethic. It became more militaristic, and Sigma 6 "procedures" were adopted (a lot of good that did...), and much of the new management either came directly from the military or from executive positions at other major retail companies such as Pepsi Cola, Best Buy, Home Depot--basically ANY line of business OTHER than banking. These people had no experience in banking, and that was ok, because BANKING just became RETAIL. Money and debt became a commodity to be sold to clients instead of managed responsibly.
Nations Bank of America then continued on an extremely irresponsible course of acquiring HUGE numbers of smaller banks across the country--artificially increasing stock value for several years. I remember my stock options doubling TWICE in one year because the value was such that the stock had to split. I took a nice trip to Europe in 2003, as a result. Fortunately, (or unfortunately...) I was younger and much more naive then...
However, depite the Bank's many dastardly doings (resulting directly from Congress/the Bush Administration's continued push to deregulate the banks; beginning, as we all know, with the Clinton administration) the TRUE error that led to the bank's ultimate downfall was the acquisition of Countrywide and perhaps, to a lesser extent, Merrill Lynch.
I still remember that, even during this time, getting a loan done for a client at BofA was a relatively difficult process. BofA was really late to the game in offering clients sub-prime mortgages and the like. Quite frankly, if you couldn't afford the loan, chances were that you wouldn't be able to get it at BofA. Risk management slowly started relenting when they started seeing the profits of its major competitors--and they toyed with the idea of providing subprime loans--but it never really got off the ground before the Financial Crisis. Countrywide, on the other hand...
So, Mr. Lewis chose (and was, in someways, apparently "forced") to acquire Merril Lynch and Countrywide--creating an UNholy trinity that not only decimated the once tremendous value of the company, but has virtually thrown it into a terminal state. The "market" won't correct anything, because no one will touch the BofA toxic waste dump with a 10 foot pole. Also, what is one to do with all the hopeless people who STILL maintain their assets and debt--and, god forbid, INVESTMENTS--with this company? Its reputation amongst people in the know is tarnished beyond repair--and the only reason the government IS helping it, in my opinion, is that with SO MANY incredible obligations and worthless assets (due to it's many irresponsible acquisitions), the government probably knows that it would probably be MORE trouble for the GLOBAL market to let them fail than to slowly "bail" them out with conditions. One could compare this to letting somebody die slowly in hospice as opposed to using a "bomb" to end his/her misery in a hospital full of innocent people...
Whew, that was long...I guess I needed to get some of this off my chest.
EDIT: spelling
- Estragon 15y agoI voted up this thread because of this comment. (Bit tired of Taibbi, but your inside history is very interesting.)
- asmithmd1 15y agoNow that the 2008 financial crises is past (deferred?) why is no one talking about breaking up these "too big to fail" institutions into companies that are small enough to fail? I am regular reader of Charles Hugh Smith's "Of Two Minds" blog: http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/ http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/ He has a recent post where he compares the Dodd-Frank supposed reform bill (over 2300 pages!) to the Glass Steagall act (37 pages) http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2012/03/we-have-no-other-choice.html http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2012/03/we-have-no-othe... He goes on to provide a common sense, 5 paragraph law that would provide some actual reform to our banking system.
- alecco 15y agoWho would buy the toxic parts?
- asmithmd1 15y agoThat is exactly the problem. The US taxpayers already "own" the toxic parts. Taxpayers are on the hook for whatever bad bets BofA has made yet there is no visibility into those bets whatsoever.
- jedberg 15y agoYou don't break it into toxic and non-toxic. You break it up by region, so you get small regional banks each with both toxic and non-toxic parts and the don't let them recombine. ie. Make Bank of America a wet coast only bank again.
- alecco 15y agoNobody would buy it without some government insurance, making it pointless. The best paths now are either letting it orderly fail (if that's possible) or forced nationalization at a symbolic price. But if I had to bet, my money would be on some travesty against the US taxpayer like Bear Stearns good assets sold for close to nothing and taxpayers taking the junk mortgage assets. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Stearns#Fed_bailout_and_sale_to_JPMorgan_Chase http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Stearns#Fed_bailout_and_sa... But current BofA management will keep complicating it as long as possible, maximizing their income. Also the legal pandora's box of imminent lawsuits makes thing very bleak.