Luttig suggests it will be up to the Secreteries of State in the various states to determine eligibility (just as for age and other qualifications), and then wh

Luttig suggests it will be up to the Secreteries of State in the various states to determine eligibility (just as for age and other qualifications), and then whatever decision they make it will be challenged, so ultimately it will probably have to be proven in court, albeit (if what the courts decide is other than "convict him first") to a "preponderance of evidence" standard rather than "beyond a reasonable doubt." I'm personally undecided on what I think about it all.