He made an obviously false statement. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. Q.E.D. Neither of us is "talking past the point", either. > how about questioning th

He made an obviously false statement. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. Q.E.D. Neither of us is "talking past the point", either. > how about questioning the racial makeup of their associates to point out their perspective COULD be biased towards specific types of thinking? Speaking of "talking past the point"...the race thing was just an example. Many people complain about insurance discrimination for reasons that have nothing to do with race.