4 ms·
It's relevant. She's a judge who approved an illegal search warrant. It's her own history of being on the wrong side of the law, and it could shed light on her
by metabagel 3y ago
It's relevant. She's a judge who approved an illegal search warrant. It's her own history of being on the wrong side of the law, and it could shed light on her motive in breaking the law in this particular case. I'm all for second chances, but two DUIs in two months is poor judgement ... and she's a judge.
- fnordpiglet 3y agoI think it less establishes a motive but aggravates any charges brought against her that might include lapses of judgement. Leniency only goes so far, and once you’ve burned chances, things get more severe progressively. Now that it’s in the national spot light, she better hope her nose is totally clean and nothing comes back on her, or her past leniency will play a favor in how severe she is judged.