> I guess that's some juicy details but it reminds me of the critiques by the restaurant owner that the paper in question often acts like a cheap tabloid If a

> I guess that's some juicy details but it reminds me of the critiques by the restaurant owner that the paper in question often acts like a cheap tabloid If a different newspaper (The Wichita Eagle) reports on the judge's DUI, I don't think that you can legitimately use that information to reinforce your view that the original newspaper was a tabloid. I do feel it's probative, too: someone with pseudo-corrupt secrets might be more opposed to throwing the book at a newspaper investigating someone else with similar pseudo-corrupt secrets. That is, the judge who was allowed to break rules of a diversion program while a prosecutor (accumulating a further conviction without triggering further consequences) is judging a business owner friendly with local police who broke rules (driving without a license after DUI).