3 ms·
I read the paper did still report on her DUI but for an unrelated reporting on a city council meeting though? The thing they didn't do was use the anonymously l
by dmix 3y ago
I read the paper did still report on her DUI but for an unrelated reporting on a city council meeting though? The thing they didn't do was use the anonymously leaked DUI information they received for the original reporting on the restaurant incident (2 different articles). Which is why they defended themselves saying the DUI stuff they later published for the city council article was simply via public records.
I could be wrong though and happy to be corrected.
Otherwise if that's is indeed the case, then how did the police learn about the DUI leak without them actually reporting on it first?
- tomnipotent 3y ago> how did the police learn about the DUI leak Since you read the article, you read the part that explains the owner of the paper, Eric Meyer, emailed the the police chief, Gideon Cody, about the tip along with a screenshot of the DOR record.
- mlyle 3y ago> Otherwise if that's is indeed the case, then how did the police learn about the DUI leak without them actually reporting on it first? * The newspaper received the information and forwarded it to the police. * A city council member also received the information and acted upon it in a public meeting. * The restaurant owner accused the paper of forwarding the information to the city council member. * The paper reported on this allegation (and denied it). * Police also reacted to this allegation.
- metabagel 3y agoAll articles which I have read, including this one, have clearly stated that the newspaper didn’t publish the DUI allegation.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]