6 ms·
> The Calorius type 37 – which had a rotor diameter of 5 meters and a height of 9 meters – produced 3.5 kilowatt of heat at a wind speed of 11 m/s (a strong bre
by realusername 3y ago
> The Calorius type 37 – which had a rotor diameter of 5 meters and a height of 9 meters – produced 3.5 kilowatt of heat at a wind speed of 11 m/s (a strong breeze, Beaufort 6). This is comparable to the heat output of the smallest electric boilers for space heating
Well, there you have it of why it's a relatively unknown tech (that I also didn't know about). The heat produced is very small for a house yet the blade still needs to be very high, making it impractical on most houses. On top of that hot water transport on long distances is a recent thing due to advancement of pipe tech which made communal version of those impossible at the time.
- usrusr 3y agoWind is just not good at all scaling down, no clever trick on the every use side or I the side of blade geometry will ever change that.
- jnsaff2 3y agoExactly this. In my local home energy generation group there are a lot of people thinking they are smart by getting wind generators from alibaba and then selling them because it’s really hard to get anything usable out of them. Someone working in the field told that anything below mast height of 30m is going to a toy at best.