5 ms·

> If you care to reply, please address the fact that you lied. Bullshit. You said they were engaging in the inverse of therapy. You leveled various insults at

> If you care to reply, please address the fact that you lied. Bullshit. You said they were engaging in the inverse of therapy. You leveled various insults at the author. > No It was a rhetorical question. So, "yes," I guess. > If you disagree that the EFT author’s mindset towards work isn’t that of reverse CBT, I look forward to rethinking it. You don't need me for that. (And yes, I disagree.)

adolph 3y ago
Stop lying about what people write. It’s especially unconvincing when what you are writing about is directly above your lie. I did not write that “they were engaging in the inverse of therapy.” I wrote “Irony aside, the essay could be categorized as reverse-CBT. Read more about Lukianoff’s idea at the link below:. . .” Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a particular technique proven to help people. Lukianoff’s idea of reverse CBT is that people engaged in it are performing many of the things that CBT works against (without speaking to that as being part of the care prescribed by a healthcare provider). Again, like your lies about what is written, you lie about “various insults at the author.” It’s plain to see that there is no insult in what was written, especially since you can’t be bothered to quote anything. You can lie, you can disagree while covering your ears, hopefully one day you can come to grips with the world as it is even if today is not that day.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- maxbond 3y ago
  That's funny, I was thinking the same thing; that your insults are obvious and that your dissembling and condescension is unconvincing. I certainly don't have the wit to make a better argument that you're being insulting than your parting message, wishing that one day I'll get a grip. Laying it in pretty thick, wouldn't you say? Good luck with all of that.

5 ms·

> If you care to reply, please address the fact that you lied. Bullshit. You said they were engaging in the inverse of therapy. You leveled various insults at

by maxbond 3y ago

adolph 3y ago
Stop lying about what people write. It’s especially unconvincing when what you are writing about is directly above your lie. I did not write that “they were engaging in the inverse of therapy.” I wrote “Irony aside, the essay could be categorized as reverse-CBT. Read more about Lukianoff’s idea at the link below:. . .” Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a particular technique proven to help people. Lukianoff’s idea of reverse CBT is that people engaged in it are performing many of the things that CBT works against (without speaking to that as being part of the care prescribed by a healthcare provider). Again, like your lies about what is written, you lie about “various insults at the author.” It’s plain to see that there is no insult in what was written, especially since you can’t be bothered to quote anything. You can lie, you can disagree while covering your ears, hopefully one day you can come to grips with the world as it is even if today is not that day.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- maxbond 3y ago
  That's funny, I was thinking the same thing; that your insults are obvious and that your dissembling and condescension is unconvincing. I certainly don't have the wit to make a better argument that you're being insulting than your parting message, wishing that one day I'll get a grip. Laying it in pretty thick, wouldn't you say? Good luck with all of that.