4 ms·
There's also the fact that the service formerly known as Twitter is running on a skeleton crew. This could easily lead to a buildup in cruft, undetected or unn
by Paul-Craft 3y ago
There's also the fact that the service formerly known as Twitter is running on a skeleton crew. This could easily lead to a buildup in cruft, undetected or unnoticed system errors, or any number of maintenance issues that could result in something like this.
- hedora 3y agoI like to think they cut costs by lopping letters off the word twitter until all they had left was a “t”, and then some bozo walked up and kicked the remaining character over.
- throwaw1yyy 3y agosite runs better since his takeover despite what the haters say. I have a large follower account - responsiveness has improved. There are downsides, with new features, algo changes etc but overall it’s been getting better.
- seba_dos1 3y agoWe all have access to Twitter and can see its downfall with our own eyes.
- throwaw1yyy 3y agohttps://twitter.com/mcuban/status/1693095184597151822?s=20 https://twitter.com/mcuban/status/1693095184597151822?s=20 Mark Cuban seems to agree, and I am also a heavy user seeing the same thing. What in particular are you seeing a proof of a downfall?
- sundaeofshock 3y agoDude, I don’t think Elon is going to see this.
- throwaw1yyy 3y agoI could care less about Elon https://twitter.com/mcuban/status/1693095184597151822?s=20 https://twitter.com/mcuban/status/1693095184597151822?s=20 Here’s Mark Cuban saying the tech/responsiveness has improved. Does he seem like the kinda guy who needs to suck up to anyone? A guy with fuckyu levels of money?
- CamperBob2 3y agoAmazing what a sudden, drastic decrease in user activity will do for a site's response time.