13 ms·
I did, but that still doesn't explain how that relates to net neutrality. I guess the court might have used the likelihood of false positives as the factor that
by franga2000 3y ago
I did, but that still doesn't explain how that relates to net neutrality. I guess the court might have used the likelihood of false positives as the factor that decides whether net neutrality or copyright law pervails in a given situation, but this isn't mentioned in the article.
- toyg 3y agoI think it makes more sense if you consider the Directive is about "universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and service", rather than "net neutrality" (which is a very ISP-oriented term).