I think you put the bar of reliability at an impossible height. Every human statement may become erroneous or incorrect when looked at with utmost rigor. It's l

I think you put the bar of reliability at an impossible height. Every human statement may become erroneous or incorrect when looked at with utmost rigor. It's like when physicians joke, "there are no healthy people, only people who haven't been diagnosed yet". Saying that Sabine and Moriarty are "a little more reliable" than the "not reliable" Thunderf00t makes me wonder to whom in the world of physics would you grant the predicate "reliable"? It goes without saying that sound skepticism has to be applied to all factual statements, but Prof. Moriarty "a little more reliable than not reliable"? Come on!