The series started with the author writing about the comedy club owner violating Covid restrictions in NYC, which is a perfectly fine subject for journalism. Th

The series started with the author writing about the comedy club owner violating Covid restrictions in NYC, which is a perfectly fine subject for journalism. The article you are looking at is a response to the comedy club guy pissing about the first article and doing the same thing he does in the GP - "no, this guy isn't a journalist, but when I post on Twitter I am and I must not express any beliefs, and for Seth to pretend that I have them and have expressed them is wrong" then proceed to advocate for the thing he said it would be unethical to express a belief about. The tone isn't gentle, but it's perfectly reasonably to then lay out, "well this guy actually had expressed this belief in medical conspiracy theories" and tie that to the original article.