> edit: ah, you just have them in a mirror. In that case, the magnitude of the risk may be less as you only need to copy data once to rebuild. I’m not sure thou

> edit: ah, you just have them in a mirror. In that case, the magnitude of the risk may be less as you only need to copy data once to rebuild. I’m not sure though as I’m not an expert on the topic. Sadly, the problem still exists even for a simple mirror. Though it can be mitigated by configuring a slow rebuild rate, so the new drive would have the time to perform the maintenance.