4 ms·
I thought the same but in my experience, I've rarely, if ever, had the need to search for email. When I did (super rare), I found that the search function in gm
by steventruong 15y ago
I thought the same but in my experience, I've rarely, if ever, had the need to search for email. When I did (super rare), I found that the search function in gmail was mostly busted. Sometimes it would omit results for email that is clearly there that match specific queries or filters. I'd have to try several different methods and even manually going back at times to get the email in question. In the end, having it overloaded with email was more of a pain for those instances where I needed to find a specific email.
Sometime towards the end of last year, I decided to wipe my entire email record (which was a lot) and start from a clean slate. Since then, I made an effort to delete any unimportant emails instantly, file the important ones I think I may need to keep, and tag temp emails that needs to be there but would be deleted once they serve their purpose (for example, online orders for items shipped).
For several months now, I've managed to keep my entire email account under 50 emails. It makes managing it much easier and great for emails I would need. This of course is base on my habits. I never really have a need to pull up the majority of old emails and leaving it there is just unnecessary clutter (personal opinion).
- gexla 15y agoThis is the direction I would like to go when I get the time to do it. Probably I will first do a backup of all my messages and setup some sort of searchable archive for them. Then delete all new messages, but saving to a different format anything which I believe will be important for the future. Another issue which has prompted me to think in this direction is the change in information handling by Google. It may not be better or worse than before, but it still got me thinking about keeping my email well pruned.