4 ms·
There are plenty of indictments you can read on the internet. It is rare for one to state how evidence was collected unless it is material to the facts of the c
by mike_d 3y ago
There are plenty of indictments you can read on the internet. It is rare for one to state how evidence was collected unless it is material to the facts of the case.
The defense can question or challenge the methods, but that is not a material part of the prosecutions case.
As for parallel construction, Herring v. US opened it up as a legitimate investigative process.
- saagarjha 3y agoNo it didn’t. It only allowed it in case of a good-faith mistake, which is very different from intentionally using a Cellebrite to capture evidence illegally.