4 ms·
I think I would advise against a direct mirroring -- instead, I'd do sync-every-24-hours or something similar. Both schemes are vulnerable to the (admittedly r
by Quekid5 3y ago
I think I would advise against a direct mirroring -- instead, I'd do sync-every-24-hours or something similar.
Both schemes are vulnerable to the (admittedly rarer) errors where both drives fail simultaneously (e.g. mobo fried them) or are just ... destroyed by a fire or whatever.
A periodic sync (while harder to set up) will occasionally save you from the deleting the wrong files which mirroring doesn't.
Either way: Any truly important data (family photos/videos, etc.) needs to be saved periodically to remote storage. There's no getting around that if you really care about the data.
- kalleboo 3y ago> A periodic sync (while harder to set up) will occasionally save you from the deleting the wrong files which mirroring doesn't Which ever solution for disks you end up with, you should definitely always be using something that keeps around periodic snapshots.
- Quekid5 3y agoAgreed, but even that is vulnerable to software bugs around snapshotting itself.