4 ms·
Your take is so bizarre, so corporate, it’s hard to imagine a human spending time to write it. “We” seems pretty appropriate, given everyone replying seems to
by superb_dev 3y ago
Your take is so bizarre, so corporate, it’s hard to imagine a human spending time to write it.
“We” seems pretty appropriate, given everyone replying seems to agree
- themodelplumber 3y ago> bizarre Best compliment so far. In my professional circles it might even be kind of boring or let's say, logically evident, to a lot of very experienced or intelligent people. Corporate, eh, I mean I'm sure some stereotypical evil corporate people from a '90s movie would act as if they totally love it & get why ads are amazing...in that sense it might be pretty on the nose... But these days I think the old adbusters take is kind of out of touch...anti-ad by itself isn't really nuanced enough for tractability in public discourse these days. The comments are all hand-written, no LLM etc. Let's say artisanal, organic, ok I'll stop there
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago> “We” seems pretty appropriate, given everyone replying seems to agree I guess it would be worth it to weigh in on this myself. I am simply not seeing what everyone else is seeing. Would you mind elaborating on what makes this so obvious?
- alphager 3y agoIn this parallel comment, the first paragraph doesn't make any sense and seems like LLM-output: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37192872 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37192872
- themodelplumber 3y agoWhy doesn't the first paragraph make any sense? > Best compliment so far. In my professional circles it might even be kind of boring or let's say, logically evident, to a lot of very experienced or intelligent people. I mean I'm reading it to myself and the words make sense. Do you mean something else, like you personally can't imagine such a professional circle existing?