3 ms·
I don’t see that as a problem. The problem is brainwashing (mostly well meaning progressives) into doom culture, it’s an easy way to justify extremely totalitar
by systemvoltage 3y ago
I don’t see that as a problem. The problem is brainwashing (mostly well meaning progressives) into doom culture, it’s an easy way to justify extremely totalitarianism.
We already went through that in the 70’s with nuclear power. Humanity would be far better off if it weren’t for 70’s progressives and their anti-nuclear agenda. It’s the same but worse this time: welcome our new climate tyrants.
Climate change is a cult with religious qualities. I haven’t seen anyone rebutting that.
I don’t give a shit if people use private jets for whatever reason.
- hhw 3y agoMaybe it has to do with the US having double the per capita carbon footprint, and double the cumulative total amount of CO2 of China, and many multiples of India: https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-per-capita/ https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-pe... https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change/#:~:text=In%20second%20place%20is%20China,cause%20of%20its%20current%20position https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-which-countries-are-his....
- goatlover 3y agoThe climate doesn't care about per capita, also nuclear power could have been used to reduce carbon footprint.
- hhw 3y agoThere's far more room for improvement when per capita is high than there is when per capita is low. And the climate certainly does care about cumulative CO2. Would have, could have, should have. But didn't. Trying to hold others accountable without getting one's own house in order just comes off as the blatant hypocrisy it actually is. Until we do better ourselves, we are in no position to call others out.