4 ms·
I wonder how much humans will have to “selectively arrange” ai generated code in order to constitute human copyright ownership. Would that mean copy and pasted
by pylua 3y ago
I wonder how much humans will have to “selectively arrange” ai generated code in order to constitute human copyright ownership. Would that mean copy and pasted code from chat gpt invalidates a whole codebase , or would it mean that as long as you don’t use it to generate an entire application it will be human copy writable ?
- halfdan 3y agoWhat’s with the burden of proof? How do you prove that something was AI generated in the first place?
- pylua 3y agoI’m not sure there is a good solution here . Potentially that could undermine the law? What happens in industries where the law is impossible to enforce ?
- 1MachineElf 3y agoI am not aware of good solutions, only hilariously bad ones: https://www.firstpost.com/world/professor-fails-entire-class-after-chatgpt-falsely-tells-him-students-used-ai-for-essay-12612612.html https://www.firstpost.com/world/professor-fails-entire-class...
- janosdebugs 3y agoI am not a lawyer, but AFAIK anything you did that rises to the required level of minimal creativity is copyrightable. If you take AI code and the do something creative with it, the parts that you did are copyrightable. Someone else can still take the same AI output and do something different with it. There are a few exceptions, such as the merger doctrine, but this is generally how it works if I understood it correctly.
- soligern 3y agoThis all is based on the honor system and there is little honor now when millions of dollars are on the line.