4 ms·
With AI, you control the idea but you have no understanding of the creative expression that will result from entering a prompt.
by EMIRELADERO 3y ago
With AI, you control the idea but you have no understanding of the creative expression that will result from entering a prompt.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- dragonwriter 3y agoWith the simplest, one-shot, prompt-only workflow, sure, that might be a reasonable approximation of the truth.
- minimaxir 3y agoWith just a text prompt, no. But there are an increasing number of ways to use human decision-making to strongly and evidently control the outputs (LoRAs, ControlNet, Img2Img) that haven't been legally tested yet.
- lowdest 3y agoThis applies only to under-specified prompting. I usually go in with a finished image in mind, and use very long prompts and inpainting to make it real. It can take dozens of images to get the prompt to reflect what I have in mind, then several more iterations to polish it. While I can technically produce several images per minute, I usually spend about 30 minutes to 1 hour to get the output I want, and more if it's going to be an extra large or complicated piece. This is very much like the "is electronic music real music?" debates when people can quickly throw together some presets and hit play.
- mackek2 3y agoYou have copyright ownership of the work you produced, the prompt (under specified or not really), but not the output of the model.