3 ms·

>>I understand the need for 'security', but still. not even for that... It is a common trope in modern times for companies to use "security" as a method to pr

>>I understand the need for 'security', but still. not even for that... It is a common trope in modern times for companies to use "security" as a method to prevent ownership of a product, Apple does it, Tesla does it, Microsoft Does it, most companies use this excuse You can have security with out giving up ownership By ownership, i use that under the original term, that I the owner of product have the sole and exclusive control over the property.

nottorp 3y ago
Forget malice, how about incompetence? In this case it was human error (or an antiquated payment system). But is the remote lockout bug free?
- CogitoCogito 3y ago
  > But is the remote lockout bug free? Of course it isn’t. This is an example of a big in the system.
  - usea 3y ago
    As a system designed to give tesla control over your property, I think it worked correctly.
  - nottorp 3y ago
    This is a bug in the system alright, but do you think there are no software bugs?
- SenAnder 3y ago
  Remote lockout under company control is malice. This malicious feature was then used incompetently.