2 ms·

They’ll likely just decide it’s not different enough. Courts aren’t computers; they can look at intent. A classic essay: What colour are your bits? https://an

• nerdponx 3y ago
  The recent Warhol Foundation vs Goldsmith ruling should make this clear. Warhol basically did just put some color filters on a photo by Goldsmith, and the Supreme Court ruled that no, that's not allowed, it's not transformative enough to be fair use, that's still Goldsmith's photo.
  • zuminator 3y ago
    That particular ruling was able to be made because the original work was available to make a comparison with. However, it's well established in the US that the author of an adaptive work is generally entitled to copyright over the modified portions.[0] So a work merely has to be presented as an human-authored adaptation of an AI template. [0] https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.pdf https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.pdf