3 ms·
it’s not rent seeking for the original creator to sell content direct to a consumer. if you wish to carry this further from the initial point, you do so withou
by catchnear4321 3y ago
it’s not rent seeking for the original creator to sell content direct to a consumer.
if you wish to carry this further from the initial point, you do so without me.
- kennywinker 3y ago> it’s not rent seeking for the original creator to sell content direct to a consumer. So it’s rent seeking for the original creator to post it for free and sell ads against it? And what’s with this “original creator” language? Does that only apply to the author, or can the company that paid the author to create it sell it without being rent-seekers? My point is: you called fb and news producers both rent seekers, and i don’t believe they both are unless you use a overly broad to the point of useless definition of rent-seeking.
- paulmd 3y agoProfiting from content production is obviously not rent seeking, but this is currently coupled to content distribution which is absolutely rent-seeking. You’re charging money for something that costs nothing to distribute, what else would it be? That’s a rent absolutely. It is a rent that secures the production aspect, but we could also have patronage models that fund the creation separately. If your game is kickstarted or you get a monthly donation to produce a video there is no need to profit from creating artificial scarcity in the distribution.