4 ms·

Click on the "3D" button on the top right corner

• globular-toast 3y ago
  Oh! OK then... that's really cool. It's interesting how they still need to do some fudging around the poles. Non-Euclidean geometry is hard, I guess. I wonder if that means the models are all done with Euclidean geometry or is it just a display thing?
  • lbrindze 3y ago
    Most of all models are resolved in some sort of projected space. It depends on the model (e.g GFS uses an inflated cube, the ICON global from dwd is projected on to an icosahedron, IFS just moves most of the calcs to a spectral space instead of point-grid, and many regional/meso scale domains use a conic projection). Also by and large it’s easier to assume the earth is spherical and then nudge any differences in datum to Mach your crs. Most often, final global models are output on to an orthogonal (plate-caree) lat/lon grid. Data at the poles (singularity) is always a bit fidly
    • globular-toast 3y ago
      What is the reason for modelling on a projected space? It seems to me at least mathematically to be fine to come up with equations in polar coordinates. It's still a metric space with great circle distance. Is it a performance tradeoff? I Euclidean distance is a lot easier to calculate.
• joemaller1 3y ago
  Not an option on mobile (iOS)