> Sadly, Pine has a long history of using poorly-supported chipsets and doing nothing to improve support. It wouldn't even be difficult either, they could just

> Sadly, Pine has a long history of using poorly-supported chipsets and doing nothing to improve support. It wouldn't even be difficult either, they could just charge slightly more and then pay a kernel developer to solve these problems. > Their products have potential and could build a huge hobbyist community behind them, but extremely few people have both the skills and the time to troubleshoot buggy kernel modules. It's not just buggy kernel modules, it's also significantly buggy hardware too. The only thing I would say they have got going for them is good connections for hardware and manufacturing which help them reduce costs, otherwise another player could easily take over.