4 ms·
It seems that the problem was not that these people didn't WANT to create products for Google, it's that they tried and failed. Obviously the reason they failed
by candiodari 3y ago
It seems that the problem was not that these people didn't WANT to create products for Google, it's that they tried and failed. Obviously the reason they failed wasn't that they couldn't make their products work.
So that leaves that they weren't allowed to create these products, which is the same as saying that they were forced to work on other people's ideas ... ideas that mostly didn't pan out.
Or that Google didn't pay them what they were worth (by the ultracapitalist definition of worth: you're worth what someone is willing to pay).
Perhaps a combination of both: that they were forced to work on unsuccessful products and couldn't get raises/promotions as a result of that. That management had it's own ideas they really, really, really needed to succeed, and when it failed they dragged a lot of people down with them.
I must say, that sounds exactly like what you'd find happening in large companies.
- epups 3y agoIt's possible that Google simply couldn't afford them anymore. At these unicorns they are leading, their current and projected net worth is so huge that even a company like Google might not be able to justify paying it without serious disruption. I always thought that's what Alphabet was for, to be honest. Trying to keep a sort of ecosystem of acquisitions and Google spin-off startups with direct Google investment.
- riku_iki 3y agoor they didn't create anything useful since that paper, and google decided not to bid on them.