> The Copyright Office granted copyright to the book as a whole but not to the individual images in the book Interesting and makes sense. I guess the best comp

> The Copyright Office granted copyright to the book as a whole but not to the individual images in the book Interesting and makes sense. I guess the best comparison I can think of is a random number generated with Math.random() is not copyrightable. But including that random number is a program is copyrightable. I'd say that a corollary to this is that if the images/words generated by the machine are not copyrightable then they cannot also be _copyright violations_