I agree that the facts don't change. However the editorial process becomes biased ad hominem and shifts away from scientific facts. Science and the people who b

I agree that the facts don't change. However the editorial process becomes biased ad hominem and shifts away from scientific facts. Science and the people who benefit from science become the victims. The purpose of scientific journals is to provide an editorial process and peer review, not only to disseminate findings. In this regard, I don't believe author websites and Twitter compares.